I just don't care. We are not aware of the process used by the NSA to only identify or search for international hacking attempts. But it would be a grave mistake to assume government surveillance is no longer something to worry about.
It is almost impossible not take into account everything associated with the manner that they were released: No matter how hard we try, we can't help but fail to segregate our judgment of the NSA's actions.
So much has been justified torture, spying by the so-called ticking time bomb scenario but there has never been shown an actual ticking time bomb scenario in real life. What NSA does with the metadata it collects on Americans is orders Reasons why the nsa is not magnitude less intrusive that what other government agencies do with what they collect, than what companies do with what we give them voluntarily and without our knowledge, or what political campaigns profess to know about you by buying data you did not intend for them to see.
Except in ongoing criminal proceedings, the NSA does not recognize attorney-client privilege in its collection. But is the intention of the surveillance not good in either case?
Such patterns have the possibility of including the innocent with the guilty. The London Police were found to be complicit in the News Of The World hacking scandal and, as ABC journalist Nick Ross noted in an article last September, many small-scale examples of abuse of power are captured on the news website Reddit.
Thanks to Verizon the NSA is a member of your friends and family plan. Mining all that data is just a matter of how many computers are devoted to the task today, and using better technology in the future will make it even easier. The daily flow of their lives does not intersect with the NSA's use of the data, so the only mechanism that connects NSA metadata collection with the "chilling" of free speech is the unreasonable expectation that it will, or that it might.
It nonetheless produced a computerized index of nearly one and one-half million names. Its operatives can then easily locate any particular call within that huge chunk of metadata.
The FISA court has issued the biggest subpoena in the history of the world to gather and store information about anything and everything that occurs on the Internet. Opportunity for Data Theft — Why should I try to break into Bank of America to steal usernames, passwords, and credit card numbers when I can break into the NSA computers and get the data from all banks all in one place?
The definition of "wrong" can change very quickly. The NSA is making a genuine attempt to track down suspicious Internet addresses. Mass surveillance could be directed not only at direct political adversaries but also their official supporters and those who might fall into a demographic of potential support.
Unfortunately, governments and their sub-contractors have a poor track record safe-guarding such data. The NSA can hold on to your encrypted communications as long as is needed to break the encryption. The consequences of such actions are clearly codified and you can look them up.
What happens to you if you shoplift from a store or murder someone in a bar fight? On the good side however they just gave science fiction writers a new paradigm to explore. They know everything you buy. Meanwhile, the Trump administration has signaled even less concern for constitutional norms than his two predecessors, presidents Bush and Obama, under whom the existing surveillance apparatus was built.
Edward Snowden exposed exposed the spying, but if he were greedy he could have used his access to steal all this information and sell it to the Chinese government or the Russian Mafia.
The secret Foreign Intelligence and Surveillance Court FISA was set up to provide judicial oversight in a classified setting to the intelligence community. The main concern for most people is that their privacy has been intruded without their permission.
Courts assess whether the targeting procedures fit the statutory definition of targeting procedures, but they do not oversee targeting decisions.
OK, let's stipulate that Obama will never do anything bad with the data. Watergate is the classic example of data-gathering about political adversaries, but compared to the potential corruption made possible by mass surveillance, that was a drop in the ocean.
The wave has more or less dissipated since. It's for our own good.The reason why Sens. Ron Wyden and Mark Udall know so much about NSA activities is not because of a whistle-blower. It is because of NSA's evolving self-disclosure.
The National Security Agency’s recently revealed surveillance programs undermine the purpose of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which was established to prevent this kind of overreach.
Jun 11, · 10 Reasons why Government Spying is a Bad Idea. By Marc Perkel Tuesday June 11, Here’s 10 reasons why the Prism program is a really really bad idea. they are not going to respect us.
/// Huh? The NSA “news” is that we are spying on ourselves. That was the point I thought. If you don’t want to be spied on–buy your. Jun 11, · Thanks to Verizon the NSA is a member of your friends and family plan.
It pisses off the world – Even if we make ourselves believe the lie the rest of the world isn’t buying it. If we can spy on them then they can spy on us.
Sep 10, · Revelations by NSA whistelblower Edward Snowden showed U.S. intelligence agencies are spying not only on the government of Brazil, but also on.
6 reasons you should, and shouldn't, freak out about the NSA data-mining. here are three cogent arguments for why these NSA revelations are a huge deal you should be very worked up about, and.Download